A few items from or about Warwick:
- "Humans and alligators are not natural bedfellows, and the two should not mix at events such as photo-shoots. In my view, doing so is arguably abusive to an animal." So says Warwick to Beyonce Knowles for the offense of posing with an alligator in photographs. Oh, and he does so at the behest of, guess who, PETA.
- “there are no proper snake farms” says Warwick and, of course, PETA is also quoted in this article.
- Arkangel, an Animal Liberation newsletter, shows Warwick involved with the Trust of the Protection of Reptiles at page 17 and this appears to be quite an old newsletter to me.
- PETA quotes Warwick in its flier against FrogOSphere.
- 2001 Warwick receiving financial support from PETA. I’ll bet that isn’t even the tip of the iceberg since they’re certainly not going to show the consulting fees paid to him as a line item for the world to see.
- ”This scene was witnessed by Clifford Warwick, a British scientist and trustee of the Reptile Protection Trust.”
- Shelf Life of Reptiles chapter in The Animal Dealers was written by Warwick and I think the slanted titles of the chapter and book speak for themselves.
Clifford Warwick isn’t involved in animal welfare; he’s a radical animal rights activist who’s been snuggling with PETA for decades. It’s no secret. In 2007, "British reptile biologist Clifford Warwick, who consults for animal-rights groups". This isn’t someone who could be considered the least bit objective about the care of captive reptiles since he’s clearly opposed to the very concept of them being held in captivity.
How does one humanely kill a fish? “Decapitation. This is possible in small fish but becomes problematic in larger fish. Decapitation of fish should only be carried out under anesthesia…” Warwick is one of the authors. SERIOUSLY? I don’t know about you but I prefer not to ingest anesthesia with my dinner. They are talking about experimental animals but this document is over a decade old and the extremes they want scientists to go in euthanasia of animals to is really extraordinary. And it shows the bent of those in the animal rights movement. They want all animals treated better than 98% of humans are treated and, in my opinion, they’ve lost their blinking minds!
These activists have never been above frightening people. They are intentionally alarmist.
Now he’s a “bird flu expert”? Sounds to me like someone with no professional boundaries at all; willing to run his mouth on any topic to forward his own agenda and keep himself in the spotlight.
Here’s a summary of Warwick’s published works (and this list is every publication I could find referenced on the internet for him):
- 1985: Red eared terrapins.
- 1986: Euthanasia of Reptiles — Decapitation: An Inhumane Method of Slaughter for the Class “Reptilia” (Letter to the Editor)
- 1986: Euthanasia of reptiles
- 1986: Red-eared terrapin farms and conservation
- 1986: Recommendations for euthanasia of experimental animals. (with others)
- 1987: Euthanasia of reptiles and amphibians (with others)
- 1989: Euthanasia of amphibians and reptiles (with others)
- 1990: Reptilian ethology in captivity: observations of some problems and an evaluation of their aetiology (with others)
- 1990: Ecological implications of the red-eared turtle trade (with others) in Texas Journal of Science, 1990
- 1990: Crocodilian slaughter methods, with special reference to spinal cord…; Texas Journal of Science, 1990
- 1990: Important ethological and other considerations of the study and …; Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 1990 – Elsevier
- 1990: Disturbance of natural habitats arising from rattlesnake round-ups. Environmental Conservation [ENVIRON. CONSERV.]. Vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 172-174. 1990
- 1991: Rattlesnake collection drives--Their implications for species and environmental conservation. (with others)
- 1991: Conservation of red-eared terrapins Trachemys scripta elegans: …; Testudo, 1991
- 1995 (Book): Health and Welfare of Captive Reptiles (with others)
- 1991: Salmonella in terrapins (with others)
- 1999: Community Solutions to Inclusion: Some Observations on Practice in Europe and the UK (with others) Not sure this is his work)
- 2001: Reptile-related salmonellosis; (with others) J R Soc Med 2001
- 2001: Exotic temptation - should we give in to the reptile trade? *(See below)
- 2004: Gastrointestinal disorders: are health care professionals missing zoonotic causes?; Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, Vol. 124, No. 3, 137-142 (2004)
- 2004: Animals and disease: zoonotic infections. Rabies.; J R Soc Promot Health. 2004 Nov;124(6):249.
- Why legalise exotic pet merkets? (with others)
- Zoonoses: drawing the battle lines
For a career approaching 25 years, this is a nominal publishing record. Since he’s long been in the UK on an island, one has to wonder why so many publications are in the Netherlands, New Zealand, Texas, and wonder even more that some are apparent vanity publications. Three do appear to be published in peer reviewed journals. Seems to be quite a bit of recycling of material though.
Reviewing this list of publications and other information on Warwick does make some things clear. Warwick has a record in herpetology and he has long been an alarmist. It is clear he does not approve one tiny bit of captive reptiles and amphibians (although it’s often noted on the internet that he was once an owner and trader of them). It is also obvious that he puts out the fear of zoonotic disease as the bogeyman to scare all from owning and keeping them in captivity.
I have long believed that zoonotic transmission is much more widespread than is known/realized but science is now discovering that AND that early exposure to animals is actually helpful to human immune systems. Warwick would have us all live without animals even if it means true detriment to our own species. I would have us find out the true benefits and detriments and deal with them based on science rather than bogeyman fears of “what if”.
The battle lines have indeed been drawn between the animal rights activists and those of us who own animals. We want them well cared for and the activists would take them away from us all and permanently; probably to the loss of many more species as humans wouldn’t support them in the wild – surely we’ve already proven that truism nicely. And Warwick is not without his detractors.
* “What troubled me more was that the author of this article
was Clifford Warwick, a man noted for his extreme anti-exotics stance.”
Clearly some in herpetology disagree with Warwick’s
stance. That article is responded to by Warwick
and the exchange is quite informative.
You can find part 2 here and part 3 here.
I’m inclined to agree with what I read from the actual animal caretakers who
are mostly on the other side of the pond and have already been dealing with him
for a while. Here’s a sampling:
Warwick seems to have bootstrapped his early nominal works into opportunities and publications of a more than questionable nature, in my opinion. He has published but not very well and should perish – at least as a professional witness on this side of the pond. I tentatively grant him my honorary degree of B.Bs.D.; Doctor of Bluff and BullShit. I will have to wait to see if that tentative granting becomes permanent after I’ve reviewed his testimony in the Arlington seizure case. He testified last week but I do not know if his testimony was completed or he will be returning to the stand this week.
In the meantime, I found this quite interesting. “Wouldn't you just love to meet this guy?! I love the way the article said ''mostly wild caught''..you can't tell that from a video and you wouldn't be able to make a pretty good judgement walking round in the main hall at Hamm.” The author is writing of Warwick in 2007. I did a double take. Isn’t that nearly identical to some of Warwick’s testimony last week in Arlington?